The knot grips adequately, but under sudden stress will slide to a limited extent thus reducing shock loading.
The Tarbuck knot is a now-obsolete knot that was made popular around 1952 by Kenneth Tarbuck, a climber and skier, for use by climbers, and was primarily used with stranded nylon ropes, before the advent of kernmantle ropes made this use both unnecessary and unsafe.[1][2]
It was used when the rope is subject to heavy or sudden loads,[3] as it will slide to a limited extent thus reducing shock (but with kernmantle ropes it can strip the outer sheath).[2] The knot was already employed by 1946 as “the knot” by American tree trimmers.[4]
This article is adapted from “Tarbuck knot” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
In mathematics, a double affine braid group is a group containing the braid group of an affine Weyl group. Their group rings have quotients called double affine Hecke algebras in the same way that the group rings of affine braid groups have quotients that are affine Hecke algebras.
For affine An groups, the double affine braid group is the fundamental group of the space of n distinct points on a 2-dimensional torus.
References
Haiman, Mark (2006). “Cherednik algebras, Macdonald polynomials and combinatorics”. International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol.3. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich. pp.843–872. ISBN978-3-03719-022-7. MR2275709. Archived from the original on 2011-08-20. Retrieved 2011-06-09.
Macdonald, I. G. (2003). Affine Hecke Algebras and Orthogonal Polynomials. Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-82472-9. MR1976581.
This article is adapted from “Double affine braid group” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
The (−2,3,7) pretzel knot has two right-handed twists in its first tangle, three left-handed twists in its second, and seven left-handed twists in its third.
In mathematics, a tangle is generally one of two related concepts:
In John Conway’s definition, an n-tangle is a proper embedding of the disjoint union of n arcs into a 3-ball; the embedding must send the endpoints of the arcs to 2n marked points on the ball’s boundary.
In link theory, a tangle is an embedding of n arcs and m circles into – the difference from the previous definition is that it includes circles as well as arcs, and partitions the boundary into two (isomorphic) pieces, which is algebraically more convenient – it allows one to add tangles by stacking them, for instance.
A third, quite different use of tangle—this one graph theoretical—was introduced by Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour,[1] who use it to describe separation in graphs. This usage has been extended to matroids.
The balance of this article discusses Conway’s sense of tangles; for the link theory sense, see that article.
Two n-tangles are considered equivalent if there is an ambient isotopy of one tangle to the other keeping the boundary of the 3-ball fixed. Tangle theory can be considered analogous to knot theory except, instead of closed loops, strings whose ends are nailed down are used. See also braid theory.
Tangle diagrams
Without loss of generality, consider the marked points on the 3-ball boundary to lie on a great circle. The tangle can be arranged to be in general position with respect to the projection onto the flat disc bounded by the great circle. The projection then gives us a tangle diagram, where we make note of over and undercrossings as with knot diagrams.
Tangles often show up as tangle diagrams in knot or link diagrams and can be used as building blocks for link diagrams, e.g. pretzel links.
Rational and algebraic tangles
Some operations on tangles:
Left: A tangle a and its reflection −a. Top right: Tangle addition, denoted by a + b. Center right: Tangle product, denoted by a b, equivalent to −a + b. Bottom right: Ramification, denoted by a , b, equivalent to −a + −b
A rational tangle is a 2-tangle that is homeomorphic to the trivial 2-tangle by a map of pairs consisting of the 3-ball and two arcs. The four endpoints of the arcs on the boundary circle of a tangle diagram are usually referred as NE, NW, SW, SE, with the symbols referring to the compass directions.
An arbitrary tangle diagram of a rational tangle may look very complicated, but there is always a diagram of a particular simple form: start with a tangle diagram consisting of two horizontal (vertical) arcs; add a “twist”, i.e. a single crossing by switching the NE and SE endpoints (SW and SE endpoints); continue by adding more twists using either the NE and SE endpoints or the SW and SE endpoints. One can suppose each twist does not change the diagram inside a disc containing previously created crossings.
We can describe such a diagram by considering the numbers given by consecutive twists around the same set of endpoints, e.g. (2, 1, -3) means start with two horizontal arcs, then 2 twists using NE/SE endpoints, then 1 twist using SW/SE endpoints, and then 3 twists using NE/SE endpoints but twisting in the opposite direction from before. The list begins with 0 if you start with two vertical arcs. The diagram with two horizontal arcs is then (0), but we assign (0, 0) to the diagram with vertical arcs. A convention is needed to describe a “positive” or “negative” twist. Often, “rational tangle” refers to a list of numbers representing a simple diagram as described.
The fraction of a rational tangle is then defined as the number given by the continued fraction . The fraction given by (0,0) is defined as . Conway proved that the fraction is well-defined and completely determines the rational tangle up to tangle equivalence.[2] An accessible proof of this fact is given in:.[3] Conway also defined a fraction of an arbitrary tangle by using the Alexander polynomial.
Operations on tangles
There is an “arithmetic” of tangles with addition, multiplication, and reciprocal operations. An algebraic tangle is obtained from the addition and multiplication of rational tangles.
The numerator closure of a rational tangle is defined as the link obtained by joining the “north” endpoints together and the “south” endpoints also together. The denominator closure is defined similarly by grouping the “east” and “west” endpoints. Rational links are defined to be such closures of rational tangles.
Conway notation
One motivation for Conway’s study of tangles was to provide a notation for knots more systematic than the traditional enumeration found in tables.
Applications
Tangles have been shown to be useful in studying DNA topology. The action of a given enzyme can be analysed with the help of tangle theory.[4]
See also
Tanglement puzzle
References
↑Robertson, Neil; Seymour, P.D. (Jul 1991). “Graph minors. X. Obstructions to tree-decomposition”. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. 52 (2): 153–190. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(91)90061-N.
↑Ernst, C.; Sumners, D. W. (November 1990). “A calculus for rational tangles: applications to DNA recombination”. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 108 (3): 489–515. Bibcode:1990MPCPS.108..489E. doi:10.1017/s0305004100069383. ISSN0305-0041.
Further reading
Adams, C. C. (2004). The Knot Book: An elementary introduction to the mathematical theory of knots. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. pp.xiv+307. ISBN0-8218-3678-1.
This article is adapted from “Tangle (mathematics)” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
Distel hitch is a friction hitch knot used to attach a carabiner to a rope, allowing a climber to descend or ascend.[1][2][3] The knot is similar to the prusik knot, however it grips the rope more consistently, making for increased climber control.[4]
This article is adapted from “Distel hitch” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
A takadai (高台), also called kōdai, is a frame used for making kumihimo, a type of Japanese braid. The braids created on the takadai are flat (3D effects can be achieved) as opposed to the braids created on the marudai[1] which have a round or polygonal section. The threads are attached to weighted bobbins called tamas and lay on wood pieces with pegs that are called koma. A wooden sword is used to lightly beat the braid once the braiding has been done. The braiding progresses on a ‘V’ front, as opposed to weaving on a regular loom that progresses on a straight front.
The art that is worked on the takadai is a braid, not a weave. Although many of the patterns used on this braiding stand resemble the up and down motion of a weave, since each thread takes a turn at being both the weft and the warp, it is a braid.
On the takadai it is possible to make intricate patterns using a technique called “pick-up braids”. The braid has two sides of two contrasting colors and is usually linked on the edges. Then a pattern is formed by interchanging strands from the bottom braid to the upper braid, and by changing the braiding sequence.[2]
Cultural context
The takadai is one of several traditional stands used in kumihimo, the Japanese craft of making braided cords. Kumihimo developed in Japan from braiding techniques introduced from continental Asia, and early uses included the decoration of Buddhist objects and scrolls. Over time, kumihimo cords[3] were also used for samurai armour, sword fittings, kimono accessories, and “obijime”, the cord used to secure an “obi”
Flat kumihimo cords, known as “hira-uchi himo”, are one of the major forms of kumihimo and are used for purposes such as kimono sashes, sword decoration, tea utensils, and accessories. [4]
Related terms
Kumihimo 組紐 – “kumi” from the Japanese verb, “kumu,” meaning “to braid.” “Himo” means “cord” or “string.” May be written as くみひも、組紐、組み紐。
Marudai– 丸台 – a wooden braiding stand with a circular top (kagami) which is pierced with a center hole. It is used to make a variety of braids, including round, square, rectangular, flat, triangular, and other polygonal shapes.
Obi – 帯 – a sash of varying widths, used to secure a kimono.
Obijime – 帯締め – the cord used to secure the obi.[5][6]
Tama – 玉 – weighted wooden bobbins used in all types of kumihimo except Karakumi. The weight provides tension on the threads; this is countered by another weight suspended from the braid underneath the kagami.
Koma – movable pegged supports used on a takadai to hold and organize the threads.
Making Kumihimo, Japanese interlaced braids, by Rodrick Owen
Comprehensive Treatrise of Braids V, Taka-dai braids 3, by Makiko Tada
This article is adapted from “Takadai” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
The directional figure eight should be tied in one way or the other depending on which way the loop will be loaded.
The directional figure eight (a.k.a. inline figure-eight loop) is a loopknot. It is a knot that can be made on the bight. The loop must only be loaded in the correct direction or the knot may fail. It is useful on a hauling line to create loops that can be used as handholds. It also provides a place to attach a Z-Drag to the line when prusiks are unavailable.
See also
Alpine butterfly loop for a loop that is easier to remember and can be loaded in either direction.
This article is adapted from “Directional figure eight” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
The Tait conjectures are three conjectures made by 19th-century mathematician Peter Guthrie Tait in his study of knots.[1] The Tait conjectures involve concepts in knot theory such as alternating knots, chirality, and writhe. All of the Tait conjectures have been solved, the most recent being the Flyping conjecture.
Background
A reduced diagram is one in which all the isthmi are removed.
Tait came up with his conjectures after his attempt to tabulate all knots in the late 19th century. As a founder of the field of knot theory, his work lacks a mathematically rigorous framework, and it is unclear whether he intended the conjectures to apply to all knots, or just to alternating knots. It turns out that most of them are only true for alternating knots.[2] In the Tait conjectures, a knot diagram is called “reduced” if all the “isthmi”, or “nugatory crossings” have been removed.
Any reduced diagram of an alternating link has the fewest possible crossings.
In other words, the crossing number of a reduced, alternating link is an invariant of the knot. This conjecture was proved by Louis Kauffman, Kunio Murasugi (村杉 邦男), and Morwen Thistlethwaite in 1987, using the Jones polynomial.[3] [4] [5]
Writhe and chirality
A second conjecture of Tait:
An amphicheiral (or acheiral) alternating link has zero writhe.
This conjecture was also proved by Kauffman and Thistlethwaite.[3][6]
Given any two reduced alternating diagrams and of an oriented, prime alternating link: may be transformed to by means of a sequence of certain simple moves called flypes.[7]
The Tait flyping conjecture was proved by Thistlethwaite and William Menasco in 1991.[8]
The Tait flyping conjecture implies some more of Tait’s conjectures:
Any two reduced diagrams of the same alternating knot have the same writhe.
This follows because flyping preserves writhe. This was proved earlier by Murasugi and Thistlethwaite.[9][6] It also follows from Greene’s work.[10]
For non-alternating knots this conjecture is not true; the Perko pair is a counterexample.[2]
This result also implies the following conjecture:
Alternating amphicheiral knots have even crossing number.[2]
This follows because a knot’s mirror image has opposite writhe. This conjecture is again only true for alternating knots: non-alternating amphichiral knot with crossing number 15 exist.[11]
↑Lickorish, W. B. Raymond (1997), An introduction to knot theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol.175, Springer-Verlag, New York, p.47, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0691-0, ISBN978-0-387-98254-0, MR1472978, S2CID122824389.
This article is adapted from “Tait conjectures” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
Swing hitch is a way to tie a swing rope to a branch or other horizontal beam.
Ashley describes it in ABOK as “… firm, strong, secure, and easily untied once the load has been removed.”
This knot serves a similar function to the sailor’s hitch.
Tying
A clove hitch is tied around the beam with the rope end.
The end continues around the beam until it meets the main part.
The end goes around the main part and then gets stuck under the first turn of the main part; preferably under the point where main part and the bridge of the clove hitch cross each other.
The end may be slipped for easier dismount or
The end may be tied to a stopper knot for more security against loosening under use.
If the place of attachment is very slippery, near the end of the beam, tapered with less diameter in the pulling direction, then one may start with more than one turn nearest the main part, effectively tying a Gripping sailor’s hitch.
If the swing is to have two parallel ropes, the standing parts both must hang from the same side of the branch, otherwise there will be forces rotating the swing seat right and left. Swing hitch reduces such forces by having the end pull the main part towards the middle of the beam and fixing it there; Using a simple clove hitch would cause more of these disturbing rotational forces.
If the swing is attached to a living tree, protecting the sap carrying live layers of the inner bark may be necessary; Suitable measures of tree protection while attaching a swing include
Choosing a grabbing and tightly holding knot such as swing hitch rather than a loop knot such as a bowline for the swing, and thus avoiding sawing or sanding type of movements of the rope,
Using a cambium protector in between rope and tree that is soft towards the tree and slippery on the rope side, so any movement of the rope slide on the protector, and does not wear off the bark.
This article is adapted from “Swing hitch” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
The diamond knot (or knife lanyard knot) is a knot for forming a decorative loop on the end of a cord such as on a lanyard.[1] A similar knot, also called the diamond knot, is a multistrand stopper knot, that is similar in appearance (although the footrope knot is really more similar, but it is simply an upside down diamond knot). Some people recommend calling this knot the knife lanyard knot in order to avoid confusion. This knot is a four strand diamond knot implemented in two strands. The knife lanyard knot and Chinese button knot are “tied alike, but they are worked differently.”[2] This knot is also used in Prayer ropes by Eastern Christians, who accredit the knot’s creation to a legend relating to Saint Anthony the Great.
The sailor’s knife lanyard knot, also called marling-spike lanyard knot, single-strand diamond knot, two-strand diamond knot, and Bosun’s whistle knot.
The diamond knot begins as a Carrick bend with the ends exiting diagonally opposite each other. When the steps below are completed the knot is rearranged and tightened so that the ends emerge from the knot parallel and opposite their own standing part. A Chinese button knot is often tied in a very similar manner, but without leaving a loop at the end.
Carrick bend start
Working ends passed over each other’s standing parts
The ends are passed up through the center of the carrick bend from below.
This article is adapted from “Diamond knot” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.
The Surgeon’s loop (a.k.a. Double Loop) is tied the same way as the surgeon’s knot but with a double strand. Therefore, this knot does use more line than most. It is a bit bulky but is great for making quick, strong loops at the end of lines and leaders for connecting to other loops.
This article is adapted from “Surgeon's loop” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.