Author: Eggtimer

  • Finite type invariant

    In the mathematical theory of knots, a finite type invariant, or Vassiliev invariant (so named after Victor Anatolyevich Vassiliev), is a knot invariant that can be extended (in a precise manner to be described) to an invariant of certain singular knots that vanishes on singular knots with m + 1 singularities and does not vanish on some singular knot with ‘m’ singularities. It is then said to be of type or order m.

    Goussarov, and (independently) Joan Birman and Xiao-Song Lin derived the following combinatorial definition of finite type invariant: Let V be a knot invariant. Define V1 to be defined on a knot with one transverse singularity.

    Consider a knot K to be a smooth embedding of a circle into R 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}} {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}}. Let K’ be a smooth immersion of a circle into R 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}} {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}} with one transverse double point. Then

    V 1 ( K ) = V ( K + ) V ( K ) {\displaystyle V^{1}(K’)=V(K_{+})-V(K_{-})} {\displaystyle V^{1}(K')=V(K_{+})-V(K_{-})},

    where K + {\displaystyle K_{+}} {\displaystyle K_{+}} is obtained from K by resolving the double point by pushing up one strand above the other, and K {\displaystyle K_{-}} {\displaystyle K_{-}} is obtained similarly by pushing the opposite strand above the other. This can be done for maps with two transverse double points, three transverse double points, etc., by using the above relation. For V to be of finite type means precisely that there must be a positive integer m such that V vanishes on maps with m + 1 {\displaystyle m+1} {\displaystyle m+1} transverse double points.

    Furthermore, there is a notion of equivalence of knots with singularities being transverse double points such thatV respects this equivalence. There is also a notion of finite type invariant for 3-manifolds.

    Examples

    The simplest nontrivial Vassiliev invariant of knots is given by the coefficient of the quadratic term of the Alexander–Conway polynomial. It is an invariant of order two. Modulo two, it is equal to the Arf invariant.

    Any coefficient of the Kontsevich invariant is a finite type invariant.

    The Milnor invariants are finite type invariants of string links.[1]

    Invariants representation

    Michael Polyak and Oleg Viro gave a description of the first nontrivial invariants of orders 2 and 3 by means of Gauss diagram representations. Mikhail N. Goussarov has proved that all Vassiliev invariants can be represented that way.

    The universal Vassiliev invariant

    In 1993, Maxim Kontsevich proved the following important theorem about Vassiliev invariants: For every knot one can compute an integral, now called the Kontsevich integral, which is a universal Vassiliev invariant, meaning that every Vassiliev invariant can be obtained from it by an appropriate evaluation. It is not known at present whether the Kontsevich integral, or the totality of Vassiliev invariants, is a complete knot invariant, or even if it detects the unknot. Computation of the Kontsevich integral, which has values in an algebra of chord diagrams, turns out to be rather difficult and has been done only for a few classes of knots up to now. There is no finite-type invariant of degree less than 11 which distinguishes mutant knots.[2]

    See also

    References

    1. Habegger, Nathan; Masbaum, Gregor (2000). “The Kontsevich integral and Milnor’s invariants”. Topology. 39 (6): 1253–1289. doi:10.1016/S0040-9383(99)00041-5.
    2. Murakami, Jun. “Finite-type invariants detecting the mutant knots” (PDF).

    Further reading

    • Victor A. Vassiliev, Cohomology of knot spaces. Theory of singularities and its applications, 23–69, Adv. Soviet Math., 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1990.
    • Joan Birman and Xiao-Song Lin, Knot polynomials and Vassiliev’s invariants. Inventiones Mathematicae, 111, 225270 (1993)
    • Bar-Natan, Dror (1995). “On the Vassiliev knot invariants”. Topology. 34 (2): 423–472. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.511.6301. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(95)93237-2.

    External links



    This article is adapted from “Finite type invariant” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Trilene knot

    Trilene knot
    Trilene knot
    Category Hitch
    Efficiency 85%
    Typical use Attaching a fishing line to a hook or swivel

    The Trilene knot /ˈtrln/ is a multipurpose fishing knot that can be used for attaching monofilament line to hooks, swivels and lures. It resists slippage and failures.[1] The knot was apparently in use at least as early as 1975 when it was included in Tom McNally’s Complete Book of Fishermen’s Knots as the “double-looped clinch knot”.[2] However, professional anglers Jimmy Houston and Ricky Green would later claim that they invented the knot in the late 1970s while experimenting during promotional events for Trilene, a fishing line manufacturer. Both men favored the idea of naming the knot after themselves, though Trilene ultimately applied its own name instead.[3] It is unclear whether Houston, Green or Trilene were aware of the knot’s earlier invention or its prior inclusion in McNally’s book.

    References

    1. “How to Tie a Trilene Knot”. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
    2. McNally, Tom (1975). Tom McNally’s Complete Book of Fishermen’s Knots. O’Hara Outdoor Books. p. 72. ISBN 978-0879554200.
    3. Healy, Joseph B. (15 Aug 2017). The Pocket Guide to Fishing Knots: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Most Important Knots for Fresh and Salt Water. Simon and Schuster.

    External links


    This article is adapted from “Trilene knot” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Fingerloop braid

    Fingerloop braid
    Fingerloop braids worked in the “graine d’orge” or barleycorn pattern.
    Fingerloop braid
    Examples of fingerloop braids. The top three are yarn. The bottom two are embroidery thread.

    Fingerloop braiding is a technique of making sturdy and decorative cords from threads. It is a type of braiding known as loop manipulation. The braid is made from loops of thread, attached at a central point, and the loops placed over the fingers and interlaced in different ways.[1]

    In Europe it originated in the Middle Ages, and excavations from London have produced numerous examples in silk from between the second half of the 12th century and first half of the 15th.[2] From the 15th century onwards, various directions and recipes for different fingerloop braid techniques began to appear in books and in print.[1]

    A related technique, which involved the loops being placed over the hand or fingers, is the Japanese kute-uchi style.[3] This technique arose in the 7th Century, and were used through the Middle Ages to the 19th century, for uses such as tying armour.[4]

    Uses

    Fingerloop braids were a type of braided cord with many uses. Beginning in the 13th century, they were used for lacing up clothing for a tighter fit. They were used to hold up men’s hose and to lace shoes. Braids were used to gather and tighten fabric at the neck and wrists of undergarments. Decorative cords were used to cinch purses in the same way.[5]

    Some wide and flat braids were made to be purely decorative and sewn on garments as trim.[5]

    Materials

    Silk was a popular choice for fingerloop braids, both for its strength and its ability to be dyed many different colors. Leather was another popular material, especially for lacing shoes and tying armor. There is evidence that wool was used. Linen and flax were likely used, but little of those materials has survived.[5]

    See also

    References

    1. 1 2 Benns, E. 2007. “Set on Yowre Hondys:” Fifteenth Century Instructions for Fingerloop Braiding in Netherton R. and Owen-Crocker, G. Medieval clothing and textiles Vol. 3. Boydell Press.
    2. Crowfoot, E., Pritchard, F. and Staniland, K. 1992. Medieval finds from excavations in London: 4. Textiles and clothing c.1150–c.1450. (HMSO, London.)
    3. Illustrated Instruction: Kute-uchi Archived 2009-08-27 at the Wayback Machine L–M BRIC News, 2004.
    4. Single-face Tortoise-shell Design Braids Archived 2005-01-10 at the Wayback Machine L–M BRIC Illustrated Instruction Series No. 7
    5. 1 2 3 Swales, Lois; Williams, Zoe Kuhn. “Fingerloop Braids”. Fingerloop Braids. Retrieved 1 May 2016.

    External links


    This article is adapted from “Fingerloop braid” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Trident loop

    Trident loop
    Trident loop
    Category Loop
    Related Ashley’s bend, Figure-eight knot, Zeppelin loop
    Typical use Forming fixed loop in end of a line

    The trident loop is a fixed loop knot which can jam when heavily loaded. It was proposed as a replacement for the figure-of-eight loop for use in climbing by Robert M. Wolfe, MD, who developed it as a loop form of Ashley’s bend. While some tests indicate its strength lies somewhere between the weaker Bowline and stronger figure-of-eight loop, the trident loop shows exceptional resistance to slipping in shock-loading tests.[1]

    Tying

    • 1. Start with a rope end.
      1. Start with a rope end.
    • 2. Start an overhand knot, leaving enough rope for the loop and the rest of the knot.
      2. Start an overhand knot, leaving enough rope for the loop and the rest of the knot.
    • 3. Complete the overhand knot.
      3. Complete the overhand knot.
    • 4. Form the loop by wrapping the working end around, and then form a bight in the working end.
      4. Form the loop by wrapping the working end around, and then form a bight in the working end.
    • 5. Feed the bight through the overhand knot.
      5. Feed the bight through the overhand knot.
    • 6. Wrap the remaining working end around the back of the knot.
      6. Wrap the remaining working end around the back of the knot.
    • 7. Feed the working end up through the bight.
      7. Feed the working end up through the bight.
    • 8. Tighten. This is the completed loop.
      8. Tighten. This is the completed loop.

    See also

    References

    1. Geoffrey Budworth, The Complete Book of Knots (London: Octopus, 1997), 94.


    This article is adapted from “Trident loop” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Figure-of-nine loop

    Figure-of-nine loop
    Figure-of-nine loop
    Names Figure-of-nine loop, Figure-nine loop
    Category Loop
    Related Figure-eight knot, Figure-of-eight follow through, Figure-of-eight loop, Stevedore knot
    Typical use Caving

    The figure-of-nine loop is a type of knot to form a fixed loop in a rope. Tied in the bight, it is made similarly to a figure-of-eight loop but with an extra half-turn before finishing the knot.[1]

    Also similar to the stevedore loop, the figure-nine loop is generally shown as being based on an intermediate form between the figure-eight knot and the stevedore knot.[1][2] The Ashley Book of Knots shows this intermediate knot, in stopper form, as #521.[3]

    While it uses more rope and is bulkier than the figure-of-eight loop, the figure-nine loop is somewhat stronger and less likely to jam.[1] It is sometimes used instead of a figure-of-eight loop to attach a rope to an anchor point or belay.[2]

    Tying

    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop

    Figure-of-nine knot

    The knot can also be tied with the end of a rope – a single strand replaces the double strand, and therefore a naked end replaces the loop. This knot can be rearranged to form a stopper knot, in the same manner as a figure-of-eight stopper knot.

    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop
    • Figure-of-nine loop

    References

    1. 1 2 3 Marbach, Georges; Bernard Tourte (2002). Alpine Caving Techniques; A Complete Guide to Safe and Efficient Caving. English edition translated and adapted by Melanie Alspaugh. Allschwil, Switzerland: Speleo Projects, Caving Publications International. p. 72. ISBN 3-908495-10-5.
    2. 1 2 Smith, Bruce; Allen Padgett (1996). On Rope; North American Vertical Rope Techniques (New Revised ed.). Huntsville, Ala.: National Speleological Society. pp. 46–47. ISBN 1-879961-05-9.
    3. Ashley, Clifford W. (1993) [1944], The Ashley Book of Knots, New York: Doubleday, p. 85, ISBN 0-385-04025-3


    This article is adapted from “Figure-of-nine loop” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Tricolorability

    Tricolorability
    A tricolored trefoil knot.

    In the mathematical field of knot theory, the tricolorability of a knot is the ability of a knot to be colored with three colors subject to certain rules. Tricolorability is an isotopy invariant, and hence can be used to distinguish between two different (non-isotopic) knots. In particular, since the unknot is not tricolorable, any tricolorable knot is necessarily nontrivial.

    Rules of tricolorability

    In these rules a strand in a knot diagram will be a piece of the string that goes from one undercrossing to the next.[1] A knot is tricolorable if each strand of the knot diagram can be colored one of three colors, subject to the following rules:[2]

    1. At least two colors must be used, and
    2. At each crossing, the three incident strands are either all the same color or all different colors.

    Some references state instead that all three colors must be used.[3] For a knot, this is equivalent to the definition above; however, for a link it is not.

    “The trefoil knot and trivial 2-link are tricolorable, but the unknot, Whitehead link, and figure-eight knot are not. If the projection of a knot is tricolorable, then Reidemeister moves on the knot preserve tricolorability, so either every projection of a knot is tricolorable or none is.”[2]

    Examples

    Here is an example of how to color a knot in accordance of the rules of tricolorability. By convention, knot theorists use the colors red, green, and blue.

    Example of a tricolorable knot

    Tricolorability

    The granny knot is tricolorable. In this coloring the three strands at every crossing have three different colors. Coloring one but not both of the trefoil knots all red would also give an admissible coloring. The true lover’s knot is also tricolorable.[4]

    Tricolorable knots with less than nine crossings include 61, 74, 77, 85, 810, 811, 815, 818, 819, 820, and 821.

    Example of a non-tricolorable knot

    Tricolorability

    The figure-eight knot is not tricolorable. In the diagram shown, it has four strands with each pair of strands meeting at some crossing. If three of the strands had the same color, then all strands would be forced to be the same color. Otherwise each of these four strands must have a distinct color. Since tricolorability is a knot invariant, none of its other diagrams can be tricolored either.

    Isotopy invariant

    Tricolorability is an isotopy invariant, which is a property of a knot or link that remains constant regardless of any ambient isotopy. This can be proven for tame knots by examining Reidemeister moves. Since each Reidemeister move can be made without affecting tricolorability, tricolorability is an isotopy invariant of tame knots.[5]

    Reidemeister Move I is tricolorable. Reidemeister Move II is tricolorable. Reidemeister Move III is tricolorable.
    Tricolorability
    Tricolorability
    Tricolorability

    Properties

    Because tricolorability is a binary classification (a link is either tricolorable or not*), it is a relatively weak invariant. The composition of a tricolorable knot with another knot is always tricolorable. A way to strengthen the invariant is to count the number of possible 3-colorings. In this case, the rule that at least two colors are used is relaxed and now every link has at least three 3-colorings (just color every arc the same color). In this case, a link is 3-colorable if it has more than three 3-colorings.

    Any separable link with a tricolorable separable component is also tricolorable.

    In torus knots

    If the torus knot/link denoted by (m,n) is tricolorable, then so are (j*m,i*n) and
    (i*n,j*m) for any natural numbers i and j.

    See also

    Sources

    1. Xaoyu Qiao, E. L. (January 20, 2015). “Knot Theory Week 2: Tricolorability” (PDF). Section 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2024.
    2. 1 2 Weisstein, Eric W. (2010). CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Second Edition, p.3045. ISBN 9781420035223. quoted at Weisstein, Eric W. “Tricolorable”. MathWorld. Accessed: May 5, 2013.
    3. Gilbert, N.D. and Porter, T. (1994) Knots and Surfaces, p. 8
    4. Bestvina, Mladen (February 2003). “Knots: a handout for mathcircles“, Math.Utah.edu.
    5. Adams, Colin (2004). The knot book: an elementary introduction to the mathematical theory of knots. Providence, R.I: American Mathematical Society. pp. 22–27. ISBN 978-0-8218-3678-1. OCLC 55633800.

    Further reading


    This article is adapted from “Tricolorability” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Tressoir

    A tressoir is a braid made of golden silk embroidered with metal and gems. It was worn by women in the 12th century.[1][2]

    References

    1. Fontenay, Eugène (1887). Les bijoux anciens et modernes [Jewels old and modern] (in French). Maison Quantin. p. 402.
    2. D’ èze, G.; Marcel, A. (1886). Histoire de la coiffure des femmes en France [History of hairstyles for women in France] (in French). pp. 30, 37.

    This article is adapted from “Tressoir” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Figure-eight loop

    Figure-eight loop
    Figure-eight loop
    Names Figure-eight loop, Flemish loop
    Category Loop
    Related figure-eight knot, flemish bend, Figure-of-nine loop, spider hitch
    Releasing Jamming
    Typical use climbing, caving
    Caveat jams
    ABoK #1047, #531
    Instructions

    Figure-eight loop (also figure-eight on a bight, figure-eight follow-through, figure-eight retrace, Flemish loop, or Flemish eight) is a type of knot created by a loop on the bight. It is used in climbing and caving.

    The Flemish loop or figure-eight loop is perhaps stronger than the loop knot. Neither of these knots is used at sea, as they are hard to untie. In hooking a tackle to any of the loops, if the loop is long enough it is better to arrange the rope as a cat’s paw.

    The double figure eight is used to put a loop in the end of a rope, or around an object. It is relatively easy to tie and is secure, but can become difficult to untie after heavy loading, and can jam badly in any rope type.

    Tying methods

    On a bight

    Figure-eight loop
    A figure-of-eight loop tied using the follow-through method.

    A figure-eight loop is created by doubling the rope into a bight, then tying the standard figure-eight knot.

    In climbing, this knot is used to save time when repeatedly attaching the rope to climbing harnesses, using locking carabiners, such as when a group of people are climbing on the same top-rope.[2]

    Follow-through

    Figure-eight loop
    A well-dressed figure-eight follow-through after tightening

    Alternatively, to tie the knot directly around an object, the follow-through method must be used.

    • Tie a regular figure eight knot with a significant amount of extra tail.
    • Loop the tail around the object.
    • Thread the tail back through the figure eight to create a normal looking figure eight on a bight.
    Climbing

    This is the standard method for attaching a rope to a climbing harness.[3][4]

    Often an additional strangle knot (which is half of a double fisherman’s knot) “backup knot” is tied in the tail of the figure 8.[5][6][7][8] This is not required for the knot’s integrity during climbing,[3][2][9][10][11][12] but could prevent ring-loading failure if belaying from the rope loop (instead of a dedicated belay loop).[13][14] It also ensures that adequate tail length has been included, and gets excess tail out of the way.[15] If the finish knot is not included, the tail should be 4 to 8 inches long.[3][16][17][18][10] The tail can also be tucked back into the knot, called a “Yosemite finish” or “Yosemite tuck”.[19] This holds the bottom loop open, making the knot easier to untie after falling, but also making it weaker in a ring-loading configuration.[20][21]

    The diameter of the loop should be kept small to avoid being caught on protrusions while falling, or clipped into accidentally while lead climbing.[3] A well-dressed knot has a symmetrical appearance, with the strands parallel through each curve.[3][22]

    See also

    References

    1. Ashley, Clifford W. (1944). The Ashley Book of Knots, p.190. Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-04025-3.
    2. 1 2 Fitch, Nate; Funderburke, Ron (2015). Climbing: Knots. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 32. ISBN 9781493015061. Tying a double overhand or barrel knot in front of the figure 8 follow through does not alter the failure mechanism of the knot. It simply adds another step to an already secure knot.
    3. 1 2 3 4 5 Gaines, Bob; Martin, Jason D. (2014). Rock Climbing: The AMGA Single Pitch Manual. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781493009626. When tied correctly, the knot is tight, with a 5- to 8-inch tail … Tie the figure eight so that its loop is about the same diameter as your belay loop. The figure eight knot does not require a backup knot.
    4. Ritter, Max (2016-07-20). “Learn to Climb: Tie in With a Figure Eight Follow-Through Knot”. Climbing Magazine. Retrieved 2018-07-13.
    5. Mountaineering : the freedom of the hills. Eng, Ronald C., Van Pelt, Julie. Mountaineers Books. 2010. p. 141. ISBN 9781594851384. OCLC 607322876. For instance, the overhand knot can be used to secure rope ends after … a rewoven figure eight (fig. 9-4c). … The rewoven figure eight is finished off by tying an overhand knot in the loose end of the rope.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
    6. Timothy W. Kidd, Jennifer Hazelrigs, ISBN 978-0-7360-6802-4 Rock climbing. Wilderness Education Association (U.S.) “There is great debate about whether the [Figure Eight] knot is finished at this point. Some people think stopping at this point is sufficient; others believe that since your life depends on this knot, you should back it up. …The most common backup knot is a [strangle knkot].”
    7. Raleigh, Duane (1998). Knots & Ropes for Climbers. Stackpole Books. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-8117-2871-3. make certain you leave a long tail, and finish this with a Double Fisherman’s
    8. Owen, Peter (1993). Knots. Courage Books. ISBN 978-1-56138-225-5. A stopper knot must be added when the threaded figure eight loop is used to tie on a line.
    9. Martin, Jason D. “The Figure-Eight Follow-Through”. American Alpine Institute. Retrieved 2018-07-13. The reality of the so-called ‘back-up knot’is that it is not necessary.
    10. 1 2 Delaney, Richard (November 7, 2018). “Members: Fig8 tail length”. RopeLab Online. Retrieved 2020-05-28. If correctly tied, dressed, and set then it does not need an additional stopper knot to secure the tail. … I would recommend allowing a tail of 100mm.
    11. Luebben, Craig (2011). Knots for Climbers. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7627-6858-5. The figure eight follow-through does not require a backup … but it can’t hurt to use one
    12. Vogel, Todd (2017-10-26). “Knot and cord strength: answers to common questions” (PDF). Earth First! Climbers Guild. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2020-06-10. You do not need a backup knot behind a figure eight tie-in knot nor should students be taught that ‘messy’ knots are weaker than ‘correct’ knots.
    13. Geldard, Jack (1 July 2008). “Belaying – ‘Rope Loop’ or ‘Belay Loop’?”. UKClimbing. Retrieved 2020-06-13. Make sure your knot is well tied, tight and has a stopper knot. Adding a stopper knot adds another link to the safety chain.
    14. rgold (16 Feb 2017). “Is a stopper knot necessary with a figure-of-8?”. UKClimbing Forums. Retrieved 2020-06-13. a situation to be aware of is when the climber belays off the rope loop rather than the harness belay loop
    15. “Is a safety knot on your figure-eight a necessity?”. Mountain Project. Retrieved 2018-07-13.
    16. “Dynamic climbing ropes manual: Precautions for use” (PDF). Mammut.com. min. 10cm
    17. “Dynamic Rope Manual: Fig. 2: Terminal connections” (PDF). Edelrid. min. 10 cm
    18. “Dynamic: Fig. 4”. Beal ropes. 10 cm
    19. Fitch, Nate; Funderburke, Ron (2015). Climbing: Knots. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-4930-1506-1.
    20. “The Figure-Eight Follow-Through”. American Alpine Institute. Retrieved 2020-06-13. may seriously weaken the knot if you use the inside of the knot as a belay loop
    21. Dahlberg, Robin. “Cross load test of common climbing knots”. Vimeo. 0:36–1:45. Retrieved 2020-06-10.
    22. JB (2018-07-17). “The Well-Dressed Figure Eight Knot: Start Hard, Finish Easy”. Fox Mountain Guides & Climbing School. Retrieved 2020-05-28.

    External links


    This article is adapted from “Figure-eight loop” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Trefoil knot

    Trefoil
    Trefoil knot
    Common name Overhand knot
    Arf invariant 1
    Braid length 3
    Braid no. 2
    Bridge no. 2
    Crosscap no. 1
    Crossing no. 3
    Genus 1
    Hyperbolic volume 0
    Stick no. 6
    Tunnel no. 1
    Unknotting no. 1
    Conway notation [3]
    A–B notation 31
    Dowker notation 4, 6, 2
    Last / Next 01 / 41
    Other
    alternating, torus, fibered, pretzel, prime, knot slice, reversible, tricolorable, twist

    In knot theory, a branch of mathematics, the trefoil knot is the simplest example of a nontrivial knot. The trefoil can be obtained by joining the two loose ends of a common overhand knot, resulting in a knotted loop. As the simplest knot, the trefoil is fundamental to the study of mathematical knot theory.

    The trefoil knot is named after the three-leaf clover (or trefoil) plant.

    Descriptions

    The trefoil knot can be defined as the curve obtained from the following parametric equations:

    x = sin t + 2 sin 2 t y = cos t 2 cos 2 t z = sin 3 t {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=\sin t+2\sin 2t\\y&=\cos t-2\cos 2t\\z&=-\sin 3t\end{aligned}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=\sin t+2\sin 2t\\y&=\cos t-2\cos 2t\\z&=-\sin 3t\end{aligned}}}

    The (2,3)-torus knot is also a trefoil knot. The following parametric equations give a (2,3)-torus knot lying on torus ( r 2 ) 2 + z 2 = 1 {\displaystyle (r-2)^{2}+z^{2}=1} {\displaystyle (r-2)^{2}+z^{2}=1}:

    x = ( 2 + cos 3 t ) cos 2 t y = ( 2 + cos 3 t ) sin 2 t z = sin 3 t {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=(2+\cos 3t)\cos 2t\\y&=(2+\cos 3t)\sin 2t\\z&=\sin 3t\end{aligned}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=(2+\cos 3t)\cos 2t\\y&=(2+\cos 3t)\sin 2t\\z&=\sin 3t\end{aligned}}}
    Trefoil knot
    Overhand knot becomes a trefoil knot by joining the ends.
    Trefoil knot
    A realization of the trefoil knot figure

    Any continuous deformation of the curve above is also considered a trefoil knot. Specifically, any curve isotopic to a trefoil knot is also considered to be a trefoil. In addition, the mirror image of a trefoil knot is also considered to be a trefoil. In topology and knot theory, the trefoil is usually defined using a knot diagram instead of an explicit parametric equation.

    In algebraic geometry, the trefoil can also be obtained as the intersection in C2 of the unit 3-sphere S3 with the complex plane curve of zeroes of the complex polynomial z2 + w3 (a cuspidal cubic).

    Left-handed trefoil
    Right-handed trefoil
    A left-handed trefoil and a right-handed trefoil

    If one end of a tape or belt is turned over three times and then pasted to the other, the edge forms a trefoil knot.[1]

    Symmetry

    The trefoil knot is chiral, in the sense that a trefoil knot can be distinguished from its own mirror image. The two resulting variants are known as the left-handed trefoil and the right-handed trefoil. It is not possible to deform a left-handed trefoil continuously into a right-handed trefoil, or vice versa. (That is, the two trefoils are not ambient isotopic.)

    Though chiral, the trefoil knot is also invertible, meaning that there is no distinction between a counterclockwise-oriented and a clockwise-oriented trefoil. That is, the chirality of a trefoil depends only on the over and under crossings, not the orientation of the curve.

    But the knot has rotational symmetry. The axis is about a line perpendicular to the page for the 3-coloured image.

    Trefoil knot
    The trefoil knot is tricolorable.
    Trefoil knot
    Form of trefoil knot without visual three-fold symmetry
    Trefoil knot
    Form of trefoil Knot with two order-2 symmetries

    Nontriviality

    The trefoil knot is nontrivial, meaning that it is not possible to “untie” a trefoil knot in three dimensions without cutting it. Mathematically, this means that a trefoil knot is not isotopic to the unknot. In particular, there is no sequence of Reidemeister moves that will untie a trefoil.

    Proving this requires the construction of a knot invariant that distinguishes the trefoil from the unknot. The simplest such invariant is tricolorability: the trefoil is tricolorable, but the unknot is not. In addition, virtually every major knot polynomial distinguishes the trefoil from an unknot, as do most other strong knot invariants.

    Classification

    In knot theory, the trefoil is the first nontrivial knot, and is the only knot with crossing number three. It is a prime knot, and is listed as 31 in the Alexander-Briggs notation. The Dowker notation for the trefoil is 4 6 2, and the Conway notation is [3].

    The trefoil can be described as the (2,3)-torus knot. It is also the knot obtained by closing the braid σ13.

    The trefoil is an alternating knot. However, it is not a slice knot, meaning it does not bound a smooth 2-dimensional disk in the 4-dimensional ball; one way to prove this is to note that its signature is not zero. Another proof is that its Alexander polynomial does not satisfy the Fox-Milnor condition.

    The trefoil is a fibered knot, meaning that its complement in S 3 {\displaystyle S^{3}} {\displaystyle S^{3}} is a fiber bundle over the circle S 1 {\displaystyle S^{1}} {\displaystyle S^{1}}. The trefoil K may be viewed as the set of pairs ( z , w ) {\displaystyle (z,w)} {\displaystyle (z,w)} of complex numbers such that | z | 2 + | w | 2 = 1 {\displaystyle |z|^{2}+|w|^{2}=1} {\displaystyle |z|^{2}+|w|^{2}=1} and z 2 + w 3 = 0 {\displaystyle z^{2}+w^{3}=0} {\displaystyle z^{2}+w^{3}=0}. Then this fiber bundle has the Milnor map ϕ ( z , w ) = ( z 2 + w 3 ) / | z 2 + w 3 | {\displaystyle \phi (z,w)=(z^{2}+w^{3})/|z^{2}+w^{3}|} {\displaystyle \phi (z,w)=(z^{2}+w^{3})/|z^{2}+w^{3}|} as the fibre bundle projection of the knot complement S 3 K {\displaystyle S^{3}\setminus \mathbf {K} } {\displaystyle S^{3}\setminus \mathbf {K} } to the circle S 1 {\displaystyle S^{1}} {\displaystyle S^{1}}. The fibre is a once-punctured torus. Since the knot complement is also a Seifert fibred with boundary, it has a horizontal incompressible surface—this is also the fiber of the Milnor map. (This assumes the knot has been thickened to become a solid torus Nε(K), and that the interior of this solid torus has been removed to create a compact knot complement S 3 int ( N ε ( K ) {\displaystyle S^{3}\setminus \operatorname {int} (\mathrm {N} _{\varepsilon }(\mathbf {K} )} {\displaystyle S^{3}\setminus \operatorname {int} (\mathrm {N} _{\varepsilon }(\mathbf {K} )}.)

    Invariants

    The Alexander polynomial of the trefoil knot is Δ ( t ) = t 1 + t 1 , {\displaystyle \Delta (t)=t-1+t^{-1},} {\displaystyle \Delta (t)=t-1+t^{-1},}since ( 1 1 0 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\0&1\end{pmatrix}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\0&1\end{pmatrix}}} is a possible Seifert matrix (for the left-hand one), or because of its Conway polynomial,[2] which is ( z ) = z 2 + 1. {\displaystyle \nabla (z)=z^{2}+1.} {\displaystyle \nabla (z)=z^{2}+1.}The Jones polynomial is V ( q ) = q 1 + q 3 q 4 , {\displaystyle V(q)=q^{-1}+q^{-3}-q^{-4},} {\displaystyle V(q)=q^{-1}+q^{-3}-q^{-4},}and the Kauffman polynomial of the trefoil is L ( a , z ) = z a 5 + z 2 a 4 a 4 + z a 3 + z 2 a 2 2 a 2 . {\displaystyle L(a,z)=za^{5}+z^{2}a^{4}-a^{4}+za^{3}+z^{2}a^{2}-2a^{2}.} {\displaystyle L(a,z)=za^{5}+z^{2}a^{4}-a^{4}+za^{3}+z^{2}a^{2}-2a^{2}.}The HOMFLY polynomial of the trefoil is L ( α , z ) = α 4 + α 2 z 2 + 2 α 2 . {\displaystyle L(\alpha ,z)=-\alpha ^{4}+\alpha ^{2}z^{2}+2\alpha ^{2}.} {\displaystyle L(\alpha ,z)=-\alpha ^{4}+\alpha ^{2}z^{2}+2\alpha ^{2}.}

    The knot group of the trefoil is given by the presentation x , y x 2 = y 3 , {\displaystyle \langle x,y\mid x^{2}=y^{3}\rangle ,} {\displaystyle \langle x,y\mid x^{2}=y^{3}\rangle ,}or equivalently[3] x , y x y x = y x y . {\displaystyle \langle x,y\mid xyx=yxy\rangle .} {\displaystyle \langle x,y\mid xyx=yxy\rangle .}This group is isomorphic to the braid group with three strands.

    In religion and culture

    As the simplest nontrivial knot, the trefoil is a common motif in iconography and the visual arts. For example, the common form of the triquetra symbol is a trefoil, as are some versions of the Germanic Valknut.

    • An ancient Norse Mjöllnir pendant with trefoils
      An ancient Norse Mjöllnir pendant with trefoils
    • A simple triquetra symbol
      A simple triquetra symbol
    • A tightly-knotted triquetra
      A tightly-knotted triquetra
    • The Germanic Valknut
      The Germanic Valknut
    • A metallic Valknut in the shape of a trefoil
      A metallic Valknut in the shape of a trefoil
    • A Celtic cross with trefoil knots
      A Celtic cross with trefoil knots
    • A Carolingian cross
      A Carolingian cross
    • Trefoil knot used in ATV's logo
      Trefoil knot used in ATV’s logo
    • Mathematical surface in which the boundary is the trefoil knot in different angles
      Mathematical surface in which the boundary is the trefoil knot in different angles

    In modern art, the woodcut Knots by M. C. Escher (1965) depicts three trefoil knots whose solid forms are twisted in different ways.[4]

    See also

    References

    1. Shaw, George Russell (MCMXXXIII). Knots: Useful & Ornamental, p.11. ISBN 978-0-517-46000-9.
    2. 3_1“, The Knot Atlas.
    3. Weisstein, Eric W. “Trefoil Knot”. MathWorld. by Wolfram. Accessed: May 5, 2013.
    4. The Official M.C. Escher Website — Gallery — “Knots” www.mcescher.com In black/green/brown via 3 woodcuts. Catalogue nr 444. The Hague, Municipal Museum (1981).

    External links

    Category:Topology


    This article is adapted from “Trefoil knot” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.

  • Figure-eight knot (mathematics)

    Figure-eight knot
    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Common name Figure-eight knot
    Arf invariant 1
    Braid length 4
    Braid no. 3
    Bridge no. 2
    Crosscap no. 2
    Crossing no. 4
    Genus 1
    Hyperbolic volume 2.02988
    Stick no. 7
    Unknotting no. 1
    Conway notation [22]
    A–B notation 41
    Dowker notation 4, 6, 8, 2
    Last / Next 31 / 51
    Other
    alternating, hyperbolic, fibered, prime, fully amphichiral, twist
    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Figure-eight knot of practical knot-tying, with ends joined

    In knot theory, a figure-eight knot (also called Listing’s knot[1]) is the unique knot with a crossing number of four. This makes it the knot with the third-smallest possible crossing number, after the unknot and the
    trefoil knot. The figure-eight knot is a prime knot.

    Origin of name

    The name is given because tying a normal figure-eight knot in a rope and then joining the ends together, in the most natural way, gives a model of the mathematical knot.

    Description

    A simple parametric representation of the figure-eight knot is as the set of all points (x,y,z) where

    x = 2 cos ( 3 t ) + cos ( t ) , y = 2 sin ( 3 t ) + sin ( t ) , z = sin ( 4 t ) , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=2\cos {(3t)}+\cos {(t)},\\y&=2\sin {(3t)}+\sin {(t)},\\z&=\sin {(4t)},\end{aligned}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=2\cos {(3t)}+\cos {(t)},\\y&=2\sin {(3t)}+\sin {(t)},\\z&=\sin {(4t)},\end{aligned}}}

    for t varying over the real numbers (see 2D visual realization at bottom right).

    The figure-eight knot is prime, alternating, rational with an associated value
    of 5/3,[2] and is achiral. The figure-eight knot is also a fibered knot. This follows from other, less simple (but very interesting) representations of the knot:

    (1) It is a homogeneous[note 1] closed braid (namely, the closure of the 3-string braid σ1σ2−1σ1σ2−1), and a theorem of John Stallings shows that any closed homogeneous braid is fibered.

    (2) It is the link at (0,0,0,0) of an isolated critical point of a real-polynomial map F: R4R2, so (according to a theorem of John Milnor) the Milnor map of F is actually a fibration. Bernard Perron found the first such F for this knot, namely,

    F ( x , y , z , t ) = G ( x , y , z 2 t 2 , 2 z t ) , {\displaystyle F(x,y,z,t)=G(x,y,z^{2}-t^{2},2zt),\,\!} {\displaystyle F(x,y,z,t)=G(x,y,z^{2}-t^{2},2zt),\,\!}

    where

    G ( x , y , z , t ) =   ( z ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 + t 2 ) + x ( 6 x 2 2 y 2 2 z 2 2 t 2 ) ,   t x 2 + y ( 6 x 2 2 y 2 2 z 2 2 t 2 ) ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(x,y,z,t)=\ &(z(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}+t^{2})+x(6x^{2}-2y^{2}-2z^{2}-2t^{2}),\\&\ tx{\sqrt {2}}+y(6x^{2}-2y^{2}-2z^{2}-2t^{2})).\end{aligned}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(x,y,z,t)=\ &(z(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}+t^{2})+x(6x^{2}-2y^{2}-2z^{2}-2t^{2}),\\&\ tx{\sqrt {2}}+y(6x^{2}-2y^{2}-2z^{2}-2t^{2})).\end{aligned}}}

    Mathematical properties

    The figure-eight knot has played an important role historically (and continues to do so) in the theory of 3-manifolds. Sometime in the mid-to-late 1970s, William Thurston showed that the figure-eight was hyperbolic, by decomposing its complement into two ideal hyperbolic tetrahedra. (Robert Riley and Troels Jørgensen, working independently of each other, had earlier shown that the figure-eight knot was hyperbolic by other means.) This construction, new at the time, led him to many powerful results and methods. For example, he was able to show that all but ten Dehn surgeries on the figure-eight knot resulted in non-Haken, non-Seifert-fibered irreducible 3-manifolds; these were the first such examples. Many more have been discovered by generalizing Thurston’s construction to other knots and links.

    The figure-eight knot is also the hyperbolic knot whose complement has the smallest possible volume, 6 Λ ( π / 3 ) 2.02988… {\displaystyle 6\Lambda (\pi /3)\approx 2.02988…} {\displaystyle 6\Lambda (\pi /3)\approx 2.02988...} (sequence A091518 in the OEIS), where Λ {\displaystyle \Lambda } {\displaystyle \Lambda } is the Lobachevsky function.[3] From this perspective, the figure-eight knot can be considered the simplest hyperbolic knot. The figure eight knot complement is a double-cover of the Gieseking manifold, which has the smallest volume among non-compact hyperbolic 3-manifolds.

    The figure-eight knot and the (−2,3,7) pretzel knot are the only two hyperbolic knots known to have more than 6 exceptional surgeries, Dehn surgeries resulting in a non-hyperbolic 3-manifold; they have 10 and 7, respectively. A theorem of Lackenby and Meyerhoff, whose proof relies on the geometrization conjecture and computer assistance, holds that 10 is the largest possible number of exceptional surgeries of any hyperbolic knot. However, it is not currently known whether the figure-eight knot is the only one that achieves the bound of 10. A well-known conjecture is that the bound (except for the two knots mentioned) is 6.

    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Simple squared depiction of figure-eight configuration.
    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Symmetric depiction generated by parametric equations.
    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Mathematical surface Illustrating Figure-eight knot
    Figure-eight knot (mathematics)
    Non-minimal diagram of figure-eight knot showing the order-4 roto-reflection symmetry (reflect in the plane)

    The figure-eight knot has genus 1 and is fibered.
    Therefore its complement fibers over the circle, the fibers being Seifert surfaces which are 2-dimensional tori with one boundary component.
    The monodromy map is then a homeomorphism of the 2-torus, which can be represented in this case by the matrix ( 2 1 1 1 ) {\displaystyle ({\begin{smallmatrix}2&1\\1&1\end{smallmatrix}})} {\displaystyle ({\begin{smallmatrix}2&1\\1&1\end{smallmatrix}})}.

    Invariants

    The Alexander polynomial of the figure-eight knot is

    Δ ( t ) = t + 3 t 1 ,   {\displaystyle \Delta (t)=-t+3-t^{-1},\ } {\displaystyle \Delta (t)=-t+3-t^{-1},\ }

    since ( 1 1 0 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}}} {\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}}}
    is a possible Seifert matrix, or because of its Conway polynomial, which is

    ( z ) = 1 z 2 ,   {\displaystyle \nabla (z)=1-z^{2},\ } {\displaystyle \nabla (z)=1-z^{2},\ }[4]

    and the Jones polynomial is

    V ( q ) = q 2 q + 1 q 1 + q 2 .   {\displaystyle V(q)=q^{2}-q+1-q^{-1}+q^{-2}.\ } {\displaystyle V(q)=q^{2}-q+1-q^{-1}+q^{-2}.\ }

    The symmetry between q {\displaystyle q} {\displaystyle q} and q 1 {\displaystyle q^{-1}} {\displaystyle q^{-1}} in the Jones polynomial reflects the fact that the figure-eight knot is achiral.

    Notes

    1. A braid is called homogeneous if every
      generator σ i {\displaystyle \sigma _{i}} {\displaystyle \sigma _{i}} either occurs always with positive or always with negative sign.

    References

    1. “Listing knot – Encyclopedia of Mathematics”. encyclopediaofmath.org. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
    2. Gruber, Hermann. “Rational Knots with 4 crossings”. Rational Knots database. Archived from the original on 2006-02-09. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
    3. William Thurston (March 2002), “7. Computation of volume”, The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds, p. 165, archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-07-27, retrieved 2020-10-19
    4. 4_1“, The Knot Atlas.

    Further reading

    External links


    This article is adapted from “Figure-eight knot (mathematics)” on Wikipedia, written by its contributors, and used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Text on this page is available under the same licence. Source snapshot: Wikipedia via Kiwix, 2026-07-20.